DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: Vacuum tube circuits work with dangerously high voltages. Do not attempt to build circuits presented on this site if you do not have the required experience and skills to work with such voltages. I assume no responsibility whatsoever for any damage caused by the usage of my circuits.

All rights of photos and text reserved. Usage of photos or text from my blog on other websites or for any other purpose only with prior permission. If you want to use any material from my blog please contact me by email.



Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Tube of the Month: The E55L

Hi!


This months tube is a wide band output pentode. The industrial tube type 8233 with the european designation E55L.



For LCR phonostages I like to use very high transconductance tubes like the telefunken EC8020 or Western Electric 437. Unfortunately these tubes are very rare and increasingly difficult to find. I'm often asked which alternative tubes could work in my LCR circuits. There is not much else available in terms of 'real' triodes. But there are some pentodes which can be transformed into high transconductance triodes by connecting the screen grid to the plate.

The E55L is one of them. It has been manufactured by such famous companies as Amperex, Mullard, Philips and probably others. The Philips datasheet classifies it as a special quality pentode designed for the use as wide band output tube. It comes with a 9 Pin Magnoval base. Triode connected it has a transconductance of 45 mS (45.000 micromhos) with an amplification factor of 30. This translates to an internal resistance in the region of only 600 Ohms. Perfect to drive a low impedance LCR network with a transformer with a slight step down of maybe 2:1. This means that it will still achieve a good gain in such a set up which is important for the use in a phono preamplifier. Another important aspect for this application is microphony. I have not tried the tube yet so I have no experience how well it is usable in such small signal applications.

Of course it seems also perfect to be used in it's intended application, as output tube. Probably good for a single stage 'spud amp', triode strapped in SE with 2W. The tube is surprisingly compact for a power output tube. About 30mm diameter and just about 60mm high. I'm usually not very fond of high transconductance tubes as drivers for output triodes. Most of them do not offer enough headroom for my taste. I like to have at least 6dB of headroom in the driver. This tube seems feasable as a driver for output triodes. Due to the low plate resistance it would be perfectly ok to use it with a 1:2 step up interstage transformer which would yield the headroom I'm looking for. Of course it could also be considered to be used as a pentode. Many possibilities to use this tube. Many people have objections against the use of a triode strapped pentode. I have no issues with that. What matters to me is how a tube performs, it's linearity and of course the achievable sound quality. The triode connected plate curves which are shown in the datasheet look very promising:


The curves look very linear. But how does it perform in real life? Here a scope screen shot of the plate curves taken from a sample:



Looks very good to me! The first two grid lines are a bit closer to each other which indicates that it is better to stay clear of the 0V grid voltage. I anyways always insist on a large headroom and try to avoid that the grid gets more negative than -1V even when driven at full signal. The grid lines in the screen shot are spaced apart in 1V steps. I also noticed a good sample to sample consistency. It is fairly easy to find closely matching tubes. And this is matching plate curves not just matching at a single operating point.

Let's have a closer look at the construction of the tube:


This photo shows the peculiar shape of the plate. It is narrowed in the center, coming closer to the cathode and grid electrodes. Apparently it is just this part which is responsible for the tube characteristics. The next photo shows another interesting detail. The tube does not have three wire grids, just two. Grid number three really is a beam forming plate:




That is the shiny boxy structure which can be seen through the holes in the plate and which extends beyond the two micas which hold the plate. The next photo shows a close up of the grid structure:



Note the precisly wound grid wires. The more coarsely spaced screen grid wound between the finer control grid and beam plate. In the upper right corner it can be nicely seen that the opening in the beam plate is exactly below the part of the anode which narrows closer to the grid structures.

The photo on the left with a close up of the pins confirms that the grid nr 3 pins are actually connected to this box structure. This photo also shows the Magnoval base which is not to be confused with the very similar Novar base. The Novar based tubes have the exact same pin spacing as Magnoval tubes. Only the pin diameter is different. A Novar tube would fit into a Magnoval socket but have loose contact. Make sure to use the correct socket with this tube. Magnoval sockets are readily available both as old stock as well as current manufacture.



The photo above shows a currently produced socket from China on the left and an old production one on the right.

As mentioned above, this tube was made by various manufacturers. The Philips E55L shown on the right has the exact same internal structure as the Amperex tubes shown above. So they were probably made in the same factory.  This tube prominently displays a SQ logo on the other side which stands for special quality. The datasheet states a life time of 10.000 hrs for these tubes. Definitely a tube just waiting to be used for audio applications. I'm looking forward to give this very special tube a try. Most likely I'll first use it in a LCR phonostage. I will report about this in future posts. Stay tuned!


Best regards

Thomas





7 comments:

  1. Lieber Thomas,

    ich würde mich sehr freuen, wenn Du die Röhren in klanglicher Hinsicht vergleichend betrachten könntest - soweit Du diese natürlich in der "Phono" gehört hast.
    Wie verhält sich z.B. die EC8020 zur WE437 und dann zur E55L und diese zur E810F?

    Viele Grüße

    Jürgen


    Dear Thomas,

    I would be delighted if you could see the tubes in aural comparison - if you've heard this of course in the "phono".
    How compares the EC8020 to WE437 and then to the E55L E810F?

    Best regards

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hallo Jürgen,

    ich habe die E55L noch nicht in einer Schaltung ausprobiert sondern bisher nur gemessen und die Konstruktion visuell begutachtet. Bisher in LCR phonos verwendet: EC8020, WE437, E810F und 6AM4.
    Klanglich würde ich die auch in der Reihenfolge präferieren. Wobei ich nie alle gleichzeitig zur Verfügung hatte. Ich vermute und hoffe, dass die E55L in ähnlichen Regionen aufspielt wie die EC8020 und WE437.

    Dear Jürgen,

    I have not tried the E55L in an audio circuit yet. So far I used EC8020, WE437, E810F and 6AM4 in LCR phonos. My preference is in that order. I expect the E55L to be sonically close to the EC8020 and WE437.

    Best regards

    Thomas

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Thomas,

    Ithink another Good candidate for the LCR would be the D3a in triode mode. This tube has nearly the Same region of transconductance but a very high amplification factor a low Noise equivalence resistance.

    Best regards,
    Bernd

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Bernd,

    that's correct, the D3A is also a good candidate. There are many others as well, but so little time to try them all ;-)

    Best regards

    Thomas

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thomas,
    Thank you for the post of triode curves for 8233. I recently tried them in a spud headphone amp and no doubt ran them at a non-so linear operating point, 150V, 18ma. Although they still sound great I need to try them at lower voltage and much higher current - wow they can take it.
    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Thomas,

    I´ll give the E55L a try within a LCR-phonostage too. I´m very exited about the outcome. Thanks for your very interesting blog.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Thomas: I left a message with you about a year ago, that I was going to build a 6CB5 amp.Well it's finished now and my audiofile friends were totally impressed with the look and mostly the incredibly good sound,so anyway I will be posting it on the diy site and sending pictures as well if I can remember how to send the pictures please forgive me but computers are not my strong point. Regards James Orend.

    ReplyDelete